Isra¨el Maoneo a,b,*, Teddy Ketani a, Glennie Ntsambi a, Larrey Kasereka Kamabu c,d, Antoine Beltchika a, Didier Baonga b, Pierre Akilimali e,f, Freddy Wami W’Ifongo b

a Department of Neurosurgery, Kinshasa University Teaching Hospital, University of Kinshasa, Congo
b Department of Surgery, Kisangani University Teaching Hospital, University of Kisangani, Congo
c Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
d Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Graben, Congo
e Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Congo
f Patrick Kayembe Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Congo

A B S T R A C T

Background: Pott’s disease remains a serious condition, particularly in low-income countries where treatment is often limited to conservative methods. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatments in patients with Pott’s disease.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 54 patients treated for Pott’s disease between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) scores were used to assess treatment outcomes. The difference-in-difference (Diff-in-Diff) method was applied to evaluate score changes from admission to 12-month follow-up. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) was calculated, adjusting for age and gender, using a significance level of 0.05.
Results: Among the 54 patients (80 % female, median age 44), 31 (57.4 %) received conservative treatment and 23 (42.6 %) underwent surgery. At baseline, the two groups were similar in demographics and disease characteristics,
though the surgical group had more severe spinal cord injury. After 12 months, ASIA scores were similar between groups (score difference = 0.015; p = 0.950), suggesting no significant advantage of surgery.
SCIM scores were also comparable (score difference = 0.146; p = 0.977). However, the Diff-in-Diff coefficient for SCIM indicated a statistically significant benefit in the surgical group (p = 0.013).
Conclusion: Time was a key factor in recovery regardless of treatment type. Surgery showed potential benefits, particularly in patients with more severe initial impairment, though further research with a larger cohort is needed to confirm these findings.

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-clinical-neuroscience

* Corresponding author at: Department of Surgery, Kisangani University Teaching Hospital, University of Kisangani, Congo.
E-mail address: maoneo@yahoo.fr (I. Maoneo).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-clinical-neuroscience
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111473
Received 7 May 2025; Accepted 7 July 2025
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 139 (2025) 111473
0967-5868/© 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are